On 2022-09-02 16:13:55 Dave Howorth wrote:
|On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 12:38:43 +0100 | |Dave Howorth <dave@howorth.org.uk> wrote: |> On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 13:11:36 +0200 |> |> "Carlos E. R." <robin.listas@telefonica.net> wrote: |> > On 2022-09-02 08:46, David C. Rankin wrote: |> > > On 9/2/22 01:40, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: |> > >> Is there a good description of the future of Leap in SUSE? A |> > >> roadmap type of thing to help one understand where things are |> > >> headed? |> > > |> > > Looks grim. |> > |> > Looks very grim. |> |> Does anybody have a good answer to Roger's question, or is there no |> roadmap? | |I repeat my question! | |> I use Leap and would like to keep doing so. But I've been |> experimenting with Mint since it offers longer support for versions. |> If I was going to have to move to a rolling release, I'd look first |> at arch. | |I found https://news.opensuse.org/tag/adaptable-linux-platform and if |that's Opensuse's idea of 'communication', I'm very disappointed. Also |why I, or an OSS project, should care about a 'microarchitecture' other |than as an implementation detail isn't clear to me. | |I've been able to have multiple versions of perl on my machine for many |years without affecting the system's use of a particular version. I |can't believe other languages haven't found solutions that are at least |as good, so what's the problem?
One supposes that some of the maintainers haven't heard about update-alternatives? Leslie -- Operating System: Linux Distribution: openSUSE Leap 15.4 x86_64 Desktop Environment: Trinity