Am Dienstag, 5. Juli 2011, 16:39:04 schrieb Daniel Bauer:
But konqueror now is not "real" konqueror. It looks just like a "wrapper" for dolphin. The goodies that konqueror had are gone. The "information" given are exactly the same as in dolphin and not what konqueror used to have.
True, I mentioned it elsewhere that konqueror cannot survive on its own because of a lack of community and hence developers. Yet Per's main concern was the viewer and AFAIK that is still possible. It's not dolphin's fault that konqueror was abandoned and it's not dolphin's aim to replace it since it does have a different philosophy. So blaming dolphin that it does not replace konqueror is the wrong approach in my opinion. Not saying that you stated that, but it is a common argument.
Of course its a philosophy to have 10'000 windows open: for each single task another one, and to search the file u are working on in each of these apps.
A bit exaggerated don't you think? You do not have to search for the files in the app if you opened it via the file-manager. In fact with an index in place often you do not even need a filemanager to navigate to the folder but just use ALT+F2, type the filename and open it. And embedding everything forces you to only have one viewer open at the same time, i.e. you cannot compare files unless you open a second konqueror or tile it to death.
However it is sad that the ingenious multi-functional program konqueror disapperad. It is to accept, because linux is free and the devs are free to put their energy where they want, and (except dolphin) there are really many many great apps. But te lack of konqueror *is* sad, it was a central and very helpful tool.
Yep. But apparently not to too many. Sven -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org