Daniel Bauer schreef op 24-04-2016 14:56:
Thanks Carl and Carlos. I've got home work to do now :-)
Interesting point. A zero-knowledge backup provider should only be allowed to call itself zero-knowledge if its access platform (client) is made or verified (ideally made really) by a third party. Otherwise you have a conflict of interests. You cannot depend on some other party always being able to make the moral high choice. What if law enforcement forces them to change their client without notifying you? If you have an independent client that is really fully independent and cannot be retracted by any party, meaning it would have to be open source, only then can you say you have a zero-knowledge encryption storage platform. In Linux we solve it by encrypting thing ourselves I guess :-/. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org