6 Feb
2006
6 Feb
'06
08:40
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 01:27:32AM +0100, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
I had claimed this inconsistency (the "harsh" word) as "<something> is newer" 48 hours before, with no reply and no reaction.
It is a quality management failure, even if it should have been there already at Hubert's time, and it is addressed now. It was already addressed 48 hours before, but I guess exactly those people who are claiming "too harsh" now had not enough sensitivity for the first notice.
So you reported that saturday morning, half past one. Seems like the weekend shift was on strike or something. Rasmus