Sun, 27 Aug 2006, by per@computer.org:
Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:
It would then be a lot clearer that the addres belongs to LO imho, and not cause any possible confusion in the future.
The reason I assign it to 'lo' is that 'lo' does not respond to arp requests. There is more to this than meets the eye - if you to know more, check out the documentation for setting up a linux virtual server with direct routing (LVS-DR).
Ok, tnx. Theo -- Theo v. Werkhoven Registered Linux user# 99872 http://counter.li.org ICBM 52 13 26N , 4 29 47E. + ICQ: 277217131 SUSE 9.2 + Jabber: muadib@jabber.xs4all.nl Kernel 2.6.8 + See headers for PGP/GPG info. Claimer: any email I receive will become my property. Disclaimers do not apply.