-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Tuesday 2006-01-31 at 16:09 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
SA needs some hundreds of spam email in order to learn efectively. Perhaps 300..500.
That's only if you use the bayes part.
Of course. But the OP mentioned "learn", and that means bayes.
SA should be perfectly capable of picking a lot of spam without using bayes.
It should... but, for example in my case, it doesn't. There are may spam emails I get that are not tagged by any other rule except bayes: I had to increase the scoring so that a 99% mark by the bayes filter gives 5 points. On the other hand, I'm getting more false positives than a few months back (and not by the bayes filter); some of those emails are also examined by a commercial filter of the mail server, and that one gives a correct score. I don't like how SA is scoring spam recently... - -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFD4AottTMYHG2NR9URAgpKAJ4jMQe1BZQQpg3RxLeVG/WKZzrJUQCdFgUK TX+LNAHyBWJ2VShjL/XZxWY= =IXMr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----