On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 04:07 -0800, Greg Wallace wrote:
On Friday, July 29, 2005 @ 3:27 AM Ken Schneider wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 12:26 +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Arun Khan <knura@yahoo.com> writes:
Reply-To is by many considered bad since you cannot easily reply offline, see for example:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Andreas Yes, but the way it is setup now you cannot easily reply to the list which is where most of the replies should go.
I agree with Ken. What percent of the time to you reply to the sender? I think the default should be what is most common. I read the www.unicom.com document and wasn't convinced. Just my 2 cents worth.
Greg Wallace
And with more and more people using a web interface to their email the reply to list feature doesn't exist especially with gmail which is the worst. I think most people reply to the list over 90% of the time. -- Ken Schneider UNIX since 1989, linux since 1994, SuSE since 1998 "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners." -Ernst Jan Plugge