![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/99bbf0e2807d0c1a81e021665cc9e09f.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Monday 25 September 2006 21:09, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
When formatting a partition there are tradeoffs to be made in selecting the block sizes. If you know you'll need lots of small files, select a small bytes/inode ratio (e.g., 1k-4k/inode). OTOH, if you know you're only going to store lots of large files, selecting a large ratio, e.g. 32k/inode, can be more performant. However, on such a system you would use 32k of space even for files which are 1 byte in size. On today's drives, this normally poses little problem, though.
Reiserfs makes the impression it would be inodeless (as in counting), by showing 0 on `df -i`, and the 'tail packing' thing just emphasizes that.
That's true - i didn't think about reiser when i wrote that. reiser can pack multiple small files into a single data block, which kind of warps (or eliminates?) the whole idea of inodes. -- ----- stephan@s11n.net http://s11n.net "...pleasure is a grace and is not obedient to the commands of the will." -- Alan W. Watts