On 14/12/09 08:10, Philipp Thomas wrote:
In a Linux system, the common punter *has* to acquire some admin knowledge otherwise it's hopeless. Linux makes it harder to shoot your foot but not impossible.
So, the most common concept/impression about Linux that it is "for geeks" is correct, according to your understanding. Correct? Unless you first acquire some "admin knoweldge" you should not install a Linux distro - least of all openSUSE - but stick with whatever flavour of Microsoft Windows you are currently using. Is this correct, according to your words? Alright then....let's go on.... "Linux makes it harder to shoot your foot but not impossible." I've been asking - if you really bothered to understand what I have been writing - is, "What is being done to stop this possibility of shooting oneself in the foot" when all the normal blurb, bruhaha, BS, about Linux being so secure that one should move from MS to Linux if you want security? OK, fine, Linux is more secure than MS or Apple s/ware - but it is NOT as watertight as a fish's bum, right? So why not simply acknowdledge that Linux is not as tight as a fish's bum - and then go about trying to ensure that it IS watertight. I asked if AppArmor was the fledging beginning of such an aim. Are you in agreement or are you not? BC -- If you don't succeed you run the risk of failure. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org