1 Sep
2005
1 Sep
'05
20:21
On Thursday 01 September 2005 20:50, Reinhard Gimbel wrote:
Siegbert Baude schrieb:
I only wanted to say that the time stamps of the Beta4 ISOs are a bit strange: 31.08.2004, huh?
Why not ? Release date for beta4 is Sep. 1st. That does not necessarily mean that the ISOs need to have that date as well.
Or do you think these Aug. 31st files are not beta4 but some fakes ?
I personally don't mind these few hours (or maybe days) of "unaligned" date information. Finally the contents counts ... A few hours yes but a whole year ???