4 Aug
2006
4 Aug
'06
19:22
On Friday 04 August 2006 00:19, John Andersen wrote:
On Thursday 03 August 2006 14:01, Ted Harding wrote:
As we know, the proportion of spam junk in the list archives is high. For example, out of almost 400 messages this month, some 175 are spam (44%).
Not true.
They say SPAM in the subect due to some overly aggressive tagging by the list hosting machine. But they are not in fact spam. Look at them and you will see.
Huh? I suppose you misunderstood. ;) As I understand it, Ted is talking about spam in the list's *archives*, not about spam in list's *emails we get sent*. (BTW, you're correct about SPAM in the Subject, but, as you might understand now, that's a different subject :P) ;) Cheers, Leen