On 2023-01-23 13:15, Per Jessen wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2023-01-23 12:56, Per Jessen wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
Patrick is using Mutt, which is ancient software, and I am using Thunderbird, which uses a very new implementation; although Marc uses an old version, I don't know if it is old enough to use enigmail implementation.
Alpine has a problem with Thunderbird: alpine uses inline pgp, which Th does not support, and uses attached signature, which alpine does not support.
All in all, it sounds like a really good argument for not using PGP on mailing list traffic :-)
I can't.
We were talking about the general idea. Your signature is only 10-12 lines, I don't imagine many people having a serious issue with that, (even if it mostly doesn't work).
Your two new postings from about 30mins ago looks good to me, knode said the signature was valid, but untrusted. Your replies in this thread are not recognised as having any signature, it just appears as an attachment.
Long ago, people impersonated me, sending mail with my name and address, and people thought it was me insulting listers. Since then, I always sign my emails.
Which brings you virtually nothing when it doesn't work in many/most cases. See above.
When it doesn't work, the fault is mostly at the receiver side, not mine. But of course, even the openSUSE key server is broken. cer@Elesar:~> gpg --keyserver keyserver.opensuse.org --search-keys 0xF62B7584 gpg: error searching keyserver: No name gpg: keyserver search failed: No name cer@Elesar:~> (example command taken from <https://news.opensuse.org/2016/12/06/announcing-opensuses-gpg-key-server-keyserver-opensuse-org/> -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from Elesar, using openSUSE Leap 15.4)