![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/2a485c68157d61c3d8844573a98dd4cd.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Lenz Grimmer <grimmer@suse.de> wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 4 Mar 1998, Nelson Marques wrote:
I have this little problem: I installed the 2.2.0 kernel in a Suse6 installation, but it runs kernel 2.0.36 instead, WHY??????
Make sure, that you use the correct install path for lilo and the Makefile. By default, the kernel will be installed as /vmlinuz, while LILO is looking for /boot/vmlinuz. Either correct /etc/lilo.conf or the variable INSTALL_PATH in /usr/src/linux/Makefile
And why doesn't the gcc compiler compile 2.2.2 kernel sources?? Procedure: make menuconfig make dep make clean make bzImage make modules make modules_install
This seems to be a common problem with 2.2.2. I still run 2.2.1, though...
Bye, LenZ
Hi Lenz, uname -a Linux wdm 2.2.2 #1 SMP Tue Feb 23 18:57:27 AKST 1999 i586 unknown Been up with Linux-2.2.2 since it came out. Worked great for me. No problems at all. Regards -Dee W.D.McKinney (Dee) deem@wdm.com Faith is acting on your passions & beliefs. - To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e Check out the SuSE-FAQ at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/"><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A">http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A</A>> and the archive at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html"><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A">http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A</A>>