On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:12:27 -0800 Joe Dufresne <nqs@tigger.tmcom.com> wrote:
On Tuesday 02 March 2004 14:27, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 23:16:38 +0100
Richard Bos <radoeka@xs4all.nl> wrote:
actually all the time we used apt. The only change now is that it is being reported to you.
:(
still... it has to be fixed.
Very well. please submit the patches to the apt4rpm project maintainers when you're done
Apparently you're a lazy reader but a proficient signature writer. apt actually got fixed and this revealed we were installing not signed packages. What I'm asking is if all the people contributing to the unofficial SUSE packages could sign their rpm. I'm perfectly aware they are doing it on a voluntary base but I'd think it is a waste of resources to do their job twice just to publish signed packages. I know how hard they are working cos I find hard to package the 2 or 3 software I like to keep up to date on a regular base and I do it for myself without the responsibility of screwing some thousands other boxes. Nevertheless I think signing all the packages that reach SUSE apt repositories is important and it will add just 1/1000 of the work that all unofficial SUSE package maintainers are already doing. oooh and this is a plea not an blame of course.