5 Feb
2021
5 Feb
'21
15:36
On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 13:29:15 +0100 "Carlos E. R." <robin.listas@telefonica.net> wrote:
On 05/02/2021 11.56, Dave Howorth wrote:
On Fri, 05 Feb 2021 08:57:55 +0100 Per Jessen <per@computer.org> wrote:
Anton Aylward wrote:
On 2021-02-04 6:03 p.m., L A Walsh wrote:
However, cut+paste of the text works, though I still have no clue what they are talking about:
Indeed. How can you have a RFC compliant DNS query that isn't 't either UPD or TCP?
DoH is becoming popular. (which does involve TCP of course). RFC8484
The latest router upgrade I got supports DoT instead. I think I prefer DoH.
Could you point to some explanation for dummies? ;-)
google dot doh dummies and take your pick (ignore the dog things, they're probably not relevant :)