On 28/12/17 09:47 AM, Wols Lists wrote:
The worry is that HDR tools will be useless. They assume that the photos were taken fractions of a second apart, and that the camera didn't move between shots. If the earth moves between shots, that will throw them completely :-)
The earth didn't move with respect to the camera. I've seen HDR done with a morning-noon-evening set of images; clouds moved, sun angle changed but the 'object' didn't move. Carlos said
I don't know if the correct thing is to match the stars or the very dark landscape.
As I mentioned, I've seen time-lapse shots of the moon with a fixed landscape. It depends on the effect he wants, and I suggest he tries both to see how they look.
If Hugin has the ability to overlay the detail in the images, then it certainly has the ability to align the stars.
Be sure to mention that to Charles Stross. -- A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org