Le 28/05/2015 20:45, Per Jessen a écrit :
Carlos E. R. wrote:
Actually, IMO, an rsync job is safer than raid, it covers more failure modes, but not as fast.
It depends on how you define "safe". In my book, the longer a system runs without two identical copies, the less safe it is. There is no way an rsync copy will ever catch up with a RAID1 mirror.
problem with raid is that nothing verify disk failures on unused data. the raid purpose is uninterrupted running, not data saving. on the same time rsync does some control, but the daily rsync I do on my server (to an other server) propagates also the errors done and not noticed immediately... no system is perfect jdd -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org