![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/cabdbf4d350ab6a15265803acab1634d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Adam Tauno Williams said the following on 06/08/2012 06:19 PM:
These days, in this use case, I'd go with btrfs. It's ready.
I tried BtrFS and wasn't happy with it. I should like it; its more to do with ReiserFS than ext4, but ... Somehow the idea of a big FS that is managed makes me nervous. Is there a proper FSCK yet? I though a FCKS was O(2) or worse, and one big FS with internal subvolume logical mounts seems to defeat the purpose of having smaller FS and running the FSCK on each in parallel. The Phoronix tests seem to indicate Btrfs vs ext4 is very OS level dependant. http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTExMjg -- "Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work." -- Thomas A. Edison -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org