Sven Burmeister wrote:
Am Montag, 4. Juli 2011, 16:50:58 schrieb Anton Aylward:
Er, Sven, Konqueror did what Per was asking for by using an EMBEDDED VIEWER, **NOT** a faster loading external viewer.
I know, I used them. But those were just kparts, i.e. the bits of an external viewer. So loading the viewing bit was quicker the second time etc. simply because it was kept in memory. If you send a picture to an open external viewer it is as quick, simply because it does not have to start.
I thought that might be a workable solution too, but even without closing the default viewer (gwenview), it takes 3 seconds to open a new picture, whereas it takes 1 second in konqueror in KDE3 (openSUSE 10.3). Wall-clock times, not overly scientific I admit. Apologies for this now longish thread - I thought my questions could be answered in a couple of sentences.
Perhaps you'd care to point out to us what advantage Dolphin has a file manager over Konqueror as a file manager?
Not really, because it's cumbersome trying to convince somebody who does not like an app and should simply use another one.
Good answer. If I may - the issue is that dolphin was touted as the konqueror replacement, and you're now saying it isn't, should not and will not be. From the end-user's perspective, useful everyday functionality has been taken away and (apparently) not replaced. That is a Bad Thing(R). -- Per Jessen, Zürich (17.9°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org