Am Dienstag, 5. Juli 2011, 07:38:59 schrieb Per Jessen:
To me it seems wrong when the replacing application provides less functionality than the application being replaced.
I really don't get why you hold on to the argument that konqueror was replaced. Replace a file on your hard disk and you will see what replacing means, the old file is gone. Konqueror is still around, so it was not replaced but dolphin added. The default was changed, but that only affects new users anyway since KDe will not change your settings regarding the apps you set as default.
For the people/business I support, it is annoying having to needlessly change to work in a different way. The users goals haven't changed.
Then those people have to invest time/money to get what they want since "nobody" else cares, i.e. konq development is dead although it allegedly being a much better and popular app than the combination of tools available by default. That logic strikes me. :) Oh – and the "default user" of linux and KDE did change over the last years hence the default user's goals changed. Just curious, what other file managers act as viewers for e.g. PDFs? Sven -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org