30 Aug
2003
30 Aug
'03
22:32
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 21:47:24 +0200 H du Plooy <linuser@ananzi.co.za> wrote:
I stand corrected. However, I think it's reasonable to expect people to be specific about the kernel version if they are referring to such an old kernel. To that end it should have read "...a single swap partition could not be larger than 128mb..."
Yes, but that was the issue- a categoric statement should either have caveats or not be made. Terence