Hi Carlos, On Tue, 31 May 2005 03:41:09 +0200 (CEST) "Carlos E. R." <.> wrote:
I have what SuSE installed for me: "/usr/lib/browser-plugins/libflashplayer.so", that belongs to flash-player-7.0.25.0-3.rpm.
But there is also a "/opt/mozilla/lib/plugins/libflashplayer.so" that is not owned by any rpm - ant that's the one used by mozilla. I probably should symlink it to the first one.
What I don't understand is why the install left it that way.
If the symlinking happens e.g. from a post-inst. script of an rpm, the resulted link will not belong to any of the rpms. And as I know there are still various other possibilities... I have SUSE 9.1 with these files (flashplayer has been backported of 9.2 if I recall it correctly): lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 42 2005-04-10 23:58 /opt/mozilla/lib/plugins/libflashplayer.so -> /usr/lib/browser-plugins/libflashplayer.so file /opt/mozilla/lib/plugins/libflashplayer.so is not owned by any package lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 42 2004-10-23 21:52 /opt/MozillaFirefox/lib/plugins/libflashplayer.so -> /usr/lib/browser-plugins/libflashplayer.so file /opt/MozillaFirefox/lib/plugins/libflashplayer.so is not owned by any package -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2096844 2004-05-10 23:34 /usr/lib/browser-plugins/libflashplayer.so balu@khazad-dum:/opt> rpm -qf /usr/lib/browser-plugins/libflashplayer.so flash-player-7.0.25.0-2.peli91 I don't think, that anything got corrupted or it's generally wrong either in my or your situation. Best regards, Pelibali Ps. In contrast till now I was not able to play Novell's file on 6 win* and 2 lin* boxes. I sent the links to friends and there was only a single one, who managed to look at it on a win* system, but _exclusively_ without sound. My personal opinion is, that in case Novell would really want even "common people" to be able to watch their advert, at least on a genuine win* it should be OK...