On 05/12/2019 13:15, Carlos E. R. wrote:
I use ext4/xfs, perhaps reiserfs on my ssd disks, just the same as others. However, btrfs has optimizations for ssd.
Isn't there any other (Linux) file system that is optimized for SSD? Does it make any difference if the SSD is a NVMe rather than a 3.5" ? https://blog.min.io/s3-benchmark-minio-on-nvme/ I've voiced objections to the principles of design for BtrFS, Ext4, ReiserFS and XFS. None of them the supporters will take seriously since they zre more to do with philosophy of architecture and coding than of deployment. I haven't looked at F2FS, and it isn't in my current kernel. neither is Resiser4FS. https://www.maketecheasier.com/best-linux-filesystem-for-ssd/ Solid-state drives are the new normal, but for some reason many Linux users are still unsure of what filesystems to go with, or even tweak them for better results. This is a shame. It is my hope that as solid-state drives become more prevalent on Linux, better filesystem choices within installers will follow. And from a year ago ... https://www.addictivetips.com/ubuntu-linux-tips/best-ssd-friendly-file-syste... Then there's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NILFS which is in my kernel. But SUSE is antagonistic to some of these https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OpenSUSE-FS-Blacklist What's the old saying ... "in your dreams!" -- A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org