On 2023-04-19 09:16, Per Jessen wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2023-04-18 21:48, Per Jessen wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
Internet Web is slow to load, with my testing stopped. This is a powerful machine. I have fast fibre.
None of that matters if the switch is poor.
Nono. The switch is good. TP-Link TL_SG1016DE
Hmm, in my experience, TP-link is sh*te. I have only had trouble with my TP-Link access points. (three of them).
The router is CRAP (Mitrastar HGW-2501GN). Don't blame the switches.
Given your interface stats, I suggest that is at most a guess.
Not a guess. Network is going perfect. Router is replaced, network fails, the problem is the router, period.
Just working with its config web page, you notice things that fail to work.
Yeah that does give one a bad impression, but it doesn't necessarily mean the tcp stack is also bad.
Isengard:
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 link/ether 4c:cc:6a:61:50:a1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff RX: bytes packets errors dropped missed mcast 23406734220 16321239 0 5700 9849 79742
First impression - that's a _lot_ dropped and missed.
Told you.
You did? when your machine is dropping packets, either there is a problem with that machine or your network is overloaded. I have no idea what "missed" means.
No, the problem is in the router. Told you.
telcontar:
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 link/ether 00:d8:61:a1:5a:bd brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff RX: bytes packets errors dropped missed mcast 1713292131 5141166 0 2838 0 73508
Also seems like a lot.
The difference is that the ping test runs on Isengard. Telcontar is the desktop machine.
Well, if it were me, I would investigate - those numbers seem way too high.
I have investigated. It is the router. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.4 x86_64 at Telcontar)