Carlos E. R. wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2014-04-17 16:26, Anton Aylward wrote:
On 04/17/2014 10:20 AM, jdd wrote:
Le 17/04/2014 14:52, Anton Aylward a écrit :
So we have a dichotomy here. We need a stable platform since Linux is used in so many commercial settings and those are "Business Critical".
may be those involved in "critical" should invest some money testing? If they use free code without any testing, so bad for them...
I've read some articles saying that should be the case with things like SSL; if they are so 'business critical' and key to the operations of the Commercial 'Web then it should be properly funded.
That's a good point.
In fact, I'm surprised we are not attacked in strength from the proprietary software camp.
It's not exactly a raging battle. Proprietary software vendors have already lost a lot of ground, attacking open source software now would only be counter-productive. Besides, "open source" does not mean "not professional".
They can say that the free software camp is not professional enough and that mission critical tasks should not be allowed to run in Linux.
Can you see anyone getting away with that without looking ridiculous? -- Per Jessen, Zürich (13.1°C) http://www.dns24.ch/ - your free DNS host, made in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org