Re: [opensuse] What were they thinking... ? "Ontologies necessary for the Nepomuk semantic desktop"

On 03/02/2011 08:05 AM, Randall R Schulz wrote:

You're disparaging the notion of ontology???

<http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/>

Oh no! I like the proper use of the inference to classification, inclusion, or exclusion based up objective features. 'shared-desktop-ontologies' actually makes sense in a strange and abstract way. The curiosity was why introduce a 3000 year old (or older) term into something that could more understandably be 'share-desktop-classes' or 'shared-desktop-code-elements' or 'share-desktop-code-sui-generis' No disparagement conveyed or intended ;-) -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org