Hi, On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Pete Connolly wrote:
On Wednesday 16 August 2006 22:13, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Martin Schröder wrote:
2006/8/16, Eberhard Moenkeberg <emoenke@gwdg.de>:
Yes! Remember, you are communicating through a mailing list server! The list is the default goal!
Are you _sure_ that you want all your flaming and vitriol on the list? I for sure don't.
Fuck off if you have no rational contributions.
Very classy reply. Really, really class. You must be proud of the volume of shite you're causing.
Yes, I really need that. You know, my real Ego is so tiny...
I feel it a pain that some of us think they have to argue during the voting phase.
But you have to understand, I feel the need to kick any ass which is levering against my face.
Don't worry, I wouldn't dare put my ass against your face. Your attitude sucks, and thats probably not all.....
This is indeed a very strong argument for the missing "Reply-To".
And you should have understood that before you replied - so what is your real intention to piss me at the knee here?
I have a two year old and a four year old boy as sons. I see better behaviour from them than I see from you. Grow up, then come back and talk to us.
Crazy. It must be solely your natural stupidity that you like to tell us this here.
This discussion is getting way too stupid. Can I vote to disregard everyone and allow Henne to decide the policy he wants on the list? Everyone else can just learn how to post regardless of how the bloody headers are set. It's not really that important. Not really. Think about it.
Seriously, this is stupid and unconstructive. Eberhard, go away and relieve your too obvious tension however feel you need to. It's an email list, not The Rapture. I will cope with whatever the list does, somehow. If this means I change what key I press to reply to a private post or a list post, I'm sure my brain will handle it.
Everyone who can't perform a 'reset' on an email list probably shouldn't be on it. Darwin and all that. This discussion is getting stupid now, there are more important things to discuss.
You missed the point and did not even see it. The matter is not "to perform" anything against the wrong list server setup, but to setup the list server in the most convenient way. Excuse me please that I have taken you more serious than you are worth it. It will not happen again. Cheers -e -- Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@gwdg.de, em@kki.org)