On 2022-12-21 15:07, James Knott wrote:
On 2022-12-21 08:16, Carlos E. R. wrote:
NAT is bad enough, but CGNAT is a disgrace. Any carrier that deploys it, without also providing IPv6 has no respect for it's customers.
They are the majority.
Yet, I get two real IPv4 addresses from my ISP. Also, with their 8 Gb fibre service, they include a 10 Gb switch, and any device plugged directly into the switch gets it's own IPv4 addresses.
Any idea why he.net failed for you? Plenty of people use it, though I haven't.
I don't remember, sorry. I don't personally need IPv6, so I did not do a lot of effort :-)
Or is your ISP one of those that provides CGNAT?
On fibre, I get a public but dynamic IPv4 address. On the mobile phone, it is CGNAT, which means I get it on the computer when I tether. "Lesser" ISPs also use GCNAT on land connections. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.4 x86_64 at Telcontar)