![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/379959e26a5fd5fce38b66d03c7eb865.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Another quick question. The theme is that the Matrox and ATI cards are solid performers, and that is good to hear. The question is what would be better, a Radion coupled with my current secondary card (Matrox millenia) or a G550 to power both monitors? My monitors are different sizes so I run different resolutions on each, without Xinerama. It would seem to me that the Matrox would be a better choice, but I've heard of people using Matrox DualHead cards on Linux, and it seems they could only use Xinerama when using both monitors. _Nick On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 03:23:16PM -0500, Lee O'Malley wrote:
On Sunday 28 October 2001 01:47 pm, Dee McKinney, went on about:
Hi Nick, (snip) I usually recommend ATI or Matox due to these having the least problems and rock solid performance. Howbeit there needs to be comensurate monitor and system to enjoy a nice card.
/Dee ----------------------------- Nick, I think I would agree with Dee here, the ATI & Matrox are both better supported cards as both companies cooperate with the Linux community in giving info about their products for successful drivers to be written. Both DRI and XFree86 support the Rage 128 or Radeon chipset since 4.1.0-10 version and I think you will find both acceptable for your 3D stuff.
Regards, Lee -- ---KMail 1.3.1--- SuSE Linux v7.2--- Registered Linux User #225206 /tracerb@sprintmail.com/ *Magic Page Products* *Team Amiga* http://home.sprintmail.com/~tracerb