-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Saturday 2006-10-14 at 15:36 +0100, Lívio Cipriano wrote:
So, I guess that the new config of the smpt servers of SuSE detects this situations.
No, it is not that. If you look at the email sent by Stevens on an account that doesn't have local spamassassin - for instance, on a gmail web client - you can see the original headers as sent from SuSE. It contain these: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at Relay1.suse.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.9 tagged_above=-20.0 required=5.0 tests=ADDRESS_IN_SUBJECT, BAYES_99, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, FORGED_RCVD_HELO, MY_LINUX X-Spam-Level: **** The antispam run was done at "Relay1.suse.de". The Bayessian database said it has 99% or more proability of being spam. Yours contains these headers instead: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at Relay2.suse.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 tagged_above=-20.0 required=5.0 tests=ADDRESS_IN_SUBJECT, BAYES_80, DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS, MY_LINUX X-Spam-Level: **** At a bayes level of 80, it was not labeled spam. Fortunately for you (and me) SuSE mail servers do not reject email sent from our own postfix. And, the word "SPAM" dissapeared because I manually removed it when answering. What they have got to do is dump their entire Bayessian database and retrain it from scratch - and dissable autotraining. :-| - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFFMPs+tTMYHG2NR9URAr7wAKCHrc1NlZvvm+A3r4LpNJXPgtcagQCeNMjR us+m5zhyAj7IBEtKRfhMyQI= =3yM7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----