Hi, BandiPat schrieb:
there is no mention of such in the box
"find /usr/share/doc/packages -name COPYING | head" returns: /usr/share/doc/packages/gnome-icon-theme/COPYING /usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-schema/COPYING /usr/share/doc/packages/yast2-trans-de/COPYING /usr/share/doc/packages/tango-icon-theme/COPYING /usr/share/doc/packages/audiofile/COPYING /usr/share/doc/packages/cabextract/COPYING /usr/share/doc/packages/dosfstools/dosfsck/COPYING /usr/share/doc/packages/dosfstools/mkdosfs/COPYING /usr/share/doc/packages/ethtool/COPYING /usr/share/doc/packages/expat/COPYING And these are only the first 10 ones.
nor are there any sources included with the release as the GPL specifies there should be
The GPL does not specify that.
if I'm not mistaken.
You are mistaken. The GPL requires that the sources must be offered, it even allows charging a fee for that. And they are offered: http://www.novell.com/de-de/products/suselinux/source_code.html After reading the post on groklaw again, I still don't understand it and actually I think the user made this post because he hates SUSE 10.1 quality and now searches for reasons to make a little bit of noise, not more. Andreas Hanke --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-help@opensuse.org