22 May
2018
22 May
'18
11:09
On 2018-05-22 11:29, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
Mystery solved (I think). It seems that our new JPEG compression to memory was reporting the original image size as being the size of the compressed buffer. In my case, it was a difference of 28 times. So, the program was writing, say, 2.8 MB instead of 100K for each image buffer. At our frame rate (50 fps), this will not work.
Ah! :-)) -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 42.3 x86_64 "Malachite" at Telcontar)