Mon, 02 Sep 2024 09:31:32 +0900 Masaru Nomiya <nomiya@lake.dti.ne.jp> :
Hello,
In the Message;
Subject : Re: 50% BINGO Re: nvidia g05 or nouveau in TW Live/Install? Message-ID : <20240901141223.5ef05adb619a0ce3b9cc5141@trixtar.org> Date & Time: Sun, 1 Sep 2024 14:12:23 -0400
bent fender <slowroller@trixtar.org> has written:
BF> Sun, 01 Sep 2024 19:56:43 +0900 BF> Masaru Nomiya <nomiya@lake.dti.ne.jp> :
MN> > In the case of nouveau, it is like this.
MN> > modeset=0 <-- enable = modeset MN> > MN> > modeset=1 <-- disable = nomodeset
BF> those two don't seem to work, nomodeset does.
Sorry, I made a mistake.
Thanks, Felix.
BF> I must have misread something somewhere, I was under the impression BF> that the nouveau driver gave everything the nviodia driver did but with BF> less finesse, including acceleration. As it is I'm not getting BF> 1920x1080 either, I'd like to get at least that resolution.
I sent a mail with ” .....?” that I did not understand the meaning of the nomodeset parameter.
The nomodeset parameter only means that the font size and resolution settings are not left to the video driver.
However, in your email, nouveau offers a resolution of 1920x1080.
In the Message;
Subject : Re: nvidia g05 or nouveau in TW Live/Install? Message-ID : <20240831205523.9996dbf907b43c515281b2a3@trixtar.org> Date & Time: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 20:55:23 -0400
[BF] == bent fender <slowroller@trixtar.org> has written:
[...] BF> Display: x11 server: X.Org v: 21.1.12 with: Xwayland v: 24.1.2 BF> driver: X: loaded: nouveau,vesa unloaded: fbdev,modesetting failed: nv BF> gpu: N/A resolution: 1920x1080 [...]
I meant I'd like to have 1920x1080
In other words, in your case, it is wrong to use the nomodeset parameter. So why do you use it?
My dear friend in distant Japan, the one thing you must never ask ME is WHY. I have no clue what any of these arguments do nor do I want to become an expert in kernel arguments, being very busy with a million other chores every day. NOT what a diesel should sound like: trixtar.org/temp-pub-buffer/loose-office.webm
Furthermore, you have disabled acceleration with noaccel=1, which is the only way to avoid your problem.
YOU suggested THAt one I think :-)) Based on suggestions by *others* there are three arguments that "my highness" has added to the kernel line at present 3 noaccel=1 nomodeset If I remove 3 I'm back with my original mess: jsy a black screen after OS selection in the grub menu, no Window-Manager, not much keyboard either althoiugh the 3-finger salute does seem to work after an eternety of waiting. If I remove noaccel=1 then I do get the WM but no GUI after log-in, just a solirary mouse arrow jumping about in the darknes. If I remove nomodeset I get what removing 3 does. With the above contorsions at least I get a GUI that I can use as long as I'm not the usual user and as long as I don't want internet. -- The use of mechanically sprung engine starters is really a three-wayy win-win-win windfall: it keeps things free of not only digital or electronic but even electric services, in addition it forces the user to keeop the engine in better than new condition or it won't start on the first shot, and last but not least in all events the user will develop very strong arms.