Are you sure that's 64 _M_? ISDNs come in increments of 64kbits. The 10meg
Cisco we have has a 10 meg ethernet interface and connections for 2 T1s
(3Mbit, fullduplex), which if you take into account the full duplex capacity
(6Mbit total) is 60% utilization of a 10mbit half-duplex ethernet port.
A little over the recommended 30%.
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000 05:03:35 +950 CN Davies
I use a Cisco router connected to our ISP via ISDN and to my SuSE 6.3 box via a Realtek 8139 LAN card. The rest of the office and also our ppp modem dialins, connect to the internet using IP chains via a second Realtek.
My only concern is that the Cisco router has a 10 MBit LAN connection to my SuSE box while we have a 64Mbit ISDN link. Not sure why we were supplied a router with a 10 Mb connection, but it works effectivly thus far.
Chris
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000 09:27:52 -0500, Mearl Danner wrote:
I would think that for your use, a linux box with NAT and a good firewall would be sufficient. Your main problem is to get a something that will connect to the DTE (serial) connection coming from the DSU on the T1 and bridging it to ethernet. We have a Cisco provided by our ISP that does this. The only routing it does is to get traffic from our firewall/NAT (A 3Com Netbuilder) to the Internet.
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000 10:27:35 -0400 Keith Warno
wrote: Hello all.
My place o' business is considering getting a T1. Half of the T will be used for data (512kbps) and the other half will be used for voice. Currently we're using crappy cable modem service provided by a crappy cable company.
Anyway, the T will come from Sprint. Sprint has suggested we get a Cisco router but personally I think that would be serious overkill. The T would be serving 8 people, possibly more (but not much more) in the future. There won't be a hell of a lot of traffic over it; most of it will be inbound email, such as from this list! ;-)
My question is: is anyone using or has anyone used a Linux box for routing in a similiar situation? If so, what kind of performance have you seen? Or better yet, is there any reason NOT to use Linux box in such a situation? If we were to get a Cisco router it would probably be leased from Sprint and be under their control. I'd like to avoid this; the point of getting the T is for reliability and to avoid having to rely on an outside party should there be a problem.
Thanks for your feedback, kw /* ** Keith Warno ** Developer & Sys Admin ** http://www.HaggleWare.com/ */
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
----------------------------------------- Mearl Danner Data Communications/Network Specialist Email: jmdanner@samford.edu Samford University
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
-- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/
----------------------------------------- Mearl Danner Data Communications/Network Specialist Email: jmdanner@samford.edu Samford University -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/