On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:07:37 -0800, Roger Luedecke wrote:
* It is monolithic as opposed to modular
I don't see it that way. The way extensions are implemented seems to be quite modular.
* It is dependent on compositing
That's true and can be problematic. Indeed, I cannot run it with the fglrx driver on one of my systems - that dependency seems to make the current fglrx driver unstable in certain configurations.
* It is unconfigurable, removing choice and forcing users into a single workflow, that has been shown to have a couple critical flaws.
I find it to be fairly configurable, but I also find the workflow works well for me. I did have to adapt, but I have found that with this particular workflow, I'm a lot more productive than I was with GNOME2. Maybe that's not entirely due to GNOME3's paradigm, but certainly the switch made me look at how I was doing things. Jim -- Jim Henderson Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org