On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 12:06 -0400, Bruce Marshall wrote:
Well said.....
No offense, but if you don't know how IPv6 works, you're spreading _FUD_. Here, you want "condescending"? Shut up if you haven't used IPv6! Better? I have read no less than 2-dozen different _incorrect_ statements in various statements here in the last week on just 3 different subjects. Almost all of it has been FUD-based. And then you have responses based on that FUD and proliferation. I _never_ disagreed with the attitude of disabling IPv6. But IPv6 is a _dream_ to wield on a network with just a couple of concepts. It is _easier_ to support IPv4, and things like the LINK LOCAL address -- enabled by distros -- have _nothing_ to do with Internet. -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, technical annoyance mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org http://thebs413.blogspot.com ----------------------------------------------------------- Americans don't get upset because citizens in some foreign nations can burn the American flag -- Americans get upset because citizens in those same nations can't burn their own