29 May
2015
29 May
'15
05:58
jdd wrote:
Le 28/05/2015 20:45, Per Jessen a écrit :
Carlos E. R. wrote:
Actually, IMO, an rsync job is safer than raid, it covers more failure modes, but not as fast.
It depends on how you define "safe". In my book, the longer a system runs without two identical copies, the less safe it is. There is no way an rsync copy will ever catch up with a RAID1 mirror.
problem with raid is that nothing verify disk failures on unused data. the raid purpose is uninterrupted running, not data saving.
Absolutely. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (15.7°C) http://www.hostsuisse.com/ - dedicated server rental in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org