24 Jun
2017
24 Jun
'17
21:42
On 2017-06-24 21:17, L A Walsh wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
You don't understand. Someone sends a private, off list, message, and says so in the body. Yet there is a reply-to header in that post message that makes the reply to that post go, unintentionally,
Where do you see that the "Reply-To" is "unintentional? I thought it was intentional.
Is there some other context I'm missing?
No, it wasn't intentional. Anton said so. The message was clearly labelled "private" in the text. Apparently the reply-to is written automatically by his software and he sometimes forgets to delete that header. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 42.2 x86_64 "Malachite" at Telcontar)