Hello, Sorry, I missed. In the Message; Subject : Re: Corrupted root Message-ID : <4c3cca0b-d67f-51da-0e0b-9f6c4d9dde1d@telefonica.net> Date & Time: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 15:14:46 +0200 [CER] == "Carlos E. R." <robin.listas@telefonica.net> has written: [...] MN> > The opinion that the conventional argument about swap does not apply MN> > to SSDs because their transfer rate is much faster than that of HDDs MN> > is presented. MN> > MN> > But this is questionable, as Carlos also implies. CER> I do not recommend using a "rotating rust" hard disk if swap is in actual CER> use. For hibernation it is ok. [...] It was a long time ago, so I don't remember exactly, but what I saw was an opinion that when using SSD, we can set a smaller swap than HDD. MN> > That is, I am using Tumbleweed on a 4TB SDD and 96GB memory PC with MN> > 4GB swap, and when I open as many Tabs as Carl does in vivaldi, swap MN> > is consumed as I see it. So I sometimes run # swapoff -a && swapon -a. CER> You do not gain speed doing that, IMO. The reason is not speed, but to free up more swap space. Now that I know how to use brave with Enlightenment, I stopped using the swap-eating vivaldi and I'm good to go. Thanks David for this point! Regards. --- ┏━━┓彡 野宮 賢 mail-to: nomiya @ lake.dti.ne.jp ┃＼／彡 ┗━━┛ "Maddox hopes that empowering users to pick their own algorithms will get them to think more about what’s involved in making them. " -- Bluesky's Custom Algorithms Could Be the Future of Social Media --