![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/519d17ce2fff16336e7a07ce8ccd4609.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
[Sorry for cross post, but I think, this discussion belongs to factory] Am Freitag, 12. Juli 2019, 13:13:58 CEST schrieb Mathias Homann:
Am Freitag, 12. Juli 2019, 11:24:59 CEST schrieb Carlos E. R.:
You simply need a much bigger root partition. 100 gigs at least.
please read this out loud, slowly, and let it sink in.
And anyone who still believes in btrfs: do the same, twice.
What I find ridiculous is, that it's the installation default. Of course, none of the about 100 openSUSE installations, that I care about (and did the installation), have btrfs roots. I use xfs¹. The only systems, that cross my site and use btrfs roots were installed by others, *less* informed users. What's interesting here: those, who are typically not capable of dealing with related issues use it, because they accepted the defaults. In that way, openSUSE becomes a (failed) technology presentation for them, before they go somewhere else. What does openSUSE want to prove with this policy? "We (about to) master a technology, that most probably *will* fall on your feet, or at least provide regular work at moments, where you can afford it fewest at all? Puzzled, Pete ¹) with 2 calculated deficits only: it cannot be shrunken, and dropbox will fail on it (for silly reasons, they insist running on ext4 file systems only. Obviously, they still have too many Linux customers..). -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org