William J. Sandman wrote:
On Thu, 16 Apr 1998, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
Does S.u.S.E. use anoother version of LILO than RedHat? The reason I ask is that I installed RedHat on a IBM Thinkpad 760XL, no problem. But then I would try S.u.S.E. 5.1, and then LILO only get as far as 'L' and then hangs. I don't know what that implies (except it's a hardware problem). But when LILO from RHL 5.0 works, why not LILO from S.u.S.E. 5.1?
Now I start it through DOS and loadlin, works OK, but still...
S.u.S.E. uses the same lilo as Red Hat (possibly a differnt version from release to release) but this *Should* make no difference. Checnk out the
Unfortunatly it makes a difference. We are using version 20, which treats the 'linear' paramemeter in a different way. So sometimes it works with RH but it doesn't with S.u.S.E. However removing 'linear' helps in most cases. Ciao, BB -- Bodo Bauer S.u.S.E., LLC fon +1-510-835 7873 bb@suse.de 458 Santa Clara Avenue fax +1-510-835 7875 <A HREF="http://www.suse.com"><A HREF="http://www.suse.com</A">http://www.suse.com</A</A>> Oakland CA, 94610 USA -- To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e