28 Aug
2022
28 Aug
'22
06:00
On 27.08.2022 23:50, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 8/27/22 01:41, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
What is exactly wrong with cross-arm-gccN (pick your version)?
The real issue is size. Somebody shouldn't need to install gigabytes of compiler and toolchain when only a few megabytes are needed.
There is no bare-metal subpackage alone. Instead you get the entire gcc, e.g.
cross-arm-none-gcc11-11.3.1+git1902-lp154.148.1.. 1529106760
That is not the package I told you about.
That's 1.4+ Gigabytes for something where less than 26M is needed for bare metal.