On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Per Jessen wrote:-
Lamp Lists wrote:
I use suse for a while and I would like to have suse on my dedicated web server, though, I was thinking that 10.2 or 10. are not "ready" for production web server? opinions?
I disagree with your opinion. We use both 10.1, 10.2 and 10.3 in production. As well as 7.3 and 8.2 for that matter.
I used 9.0, 9.3 and the 64bit version of 10.0 for a web server in the past, and had no major problems with any of them[0]. My present one is a 32bit 10.3 system, although a quick change to a single port-forwarding rule in my router would have a 64bit system doing the same job with no visible differences. [0] There were a few minor things that needed sorting out, but those were because I'd not configured something just right. Regards, David Bolt -- Team Acorn: http://www.distributed.net/ OGR-P2 @ ~100Mnodes RC5-72 @ ~15Mkeys SUSE 10.1 32bit | openSUSE 10.2 32bit | openSUSE 10.3 32bit | openSUSE 11.0a1 SUSE 10.1 64bit | openSUSE 10.2 64bit | openSUSE 10.3 64bit RISC OS 3.6 | TOS 4.02 | openSUSE 10.3 PPC |RISC OS 3.11 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org