On 02/01/2016 10:16 AM, jdd wrote:
Le 01/02/2016 16:07, Anton Aylward a écrit :
1. Shotwell is an inferior photoeditor
usually, the camera setup (what the camera do from raw to jpg) is recorded in the raw file.
Oh? Why do you say that? It is completely at variance with my understanding of what RAW is. Are you talking abut a JPG being embedded in a RAW file? I ask this because on my camera if I select RAW ONLY (as opposed to RAW+JPG) a) all the 'scene' settings are now disabled. That means the camera isn't converting raw to a JPG using a particular algorithm. it can't, no algorithm is selected b) there are/is no JPG embedded in the produced RAW files This makes sense to me. !f you have said "NO! and I mean !NO!" to JPG then its going to forget about JPG completely because it doesn't know ( sorry for the pun) what algorithm to use to convert RAW to JPG. Is this some peculiarity of your Nikon, that it *always* embeds some kind of JPG in the RAW, regardless of the other settings, even when it don't know what kind of JPG to produce? -- A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org