On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 04:05 -0400, Allen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 12:58:20AM -0700, Preston Crawford wrote:
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 03:44 -0400, Allen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 11:32:37PM -0700, Preston Crawford wrote:
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 23:14 -0600, JD. Brown wrote:
> I'm running the latest OO beta (.95) on 9.2 and loving it. So I am > totally happy with what they have included. (even though I don't have > 9.3 yet) > > Life is tough. Deal with it.
How is this tough? It's not tough, it's just a bad choice on SuSE's part in my opinion. One I hope doesn't continue or else I'll have to go distro shopping. And I don't think I'm alone in that sentiment.
Preston
It's backed by SUSE on their choice for doing this and they have developers that work on OO fulltime. They did a lot of work in this Beta to make it very usable. Want links???
No. You're clearly just an apologist and not here to help anyone.
Preston
And you're clearly a retard. You've been told 900 times (Almost once for
Is this what the mailing list has come to? Name calling? You've got to be kidding me.
I was hoping you were. After 12 hours I'm thinking you just might be serious.
I am serious. You, I'm not sure what your deal is.
each mail you've sent bitching) to tell SUSE, not us. If a browser is oh so simple like firefox is (Your words) then build your own.
You don't get it.
You'r right, because I've yet to have the same problem you've got and I have 4 versions of SUSE running here. I haven't even gotten a stability issue, and it would seem no one else on this list has either.
Actually, a couple have. One emailed me and I supplied at least some help to rollback to a previous version. I think that was email 8764.
#1 - I fixed the problem by rolling back to a previous version of Firefox. The other 899 emails (a specious number, anyway) are regarding the general stability of SUSE these days. A generally respectful discussion, minus posts like yours.
Don't expect respect. I know I'm not the only one tired of seeing your mails which have been whinning. I didn't find one bit of "respectful discussion". You come off as a child.
???? I came off as a child for complaining about the stability of a YOU update? Is this not a place to discuss SUSE or am I wrong?
#2 - I never said firefox is simple. I said it's basic functionality for an OS. i.e. Functionality that should be tested before being released. Why you can't understand that, I don't know.
Uhhh, no, you said simple, I have the mail right here.
I said "basic" and what I meant is entirely different from how you read it.
After reading the rest of your mails it astounds me you've managed not to drool on your machine enough to kill it or you, and you have this aura
Yet more personal insults.
Yet more whining.
Pointing out that you can't do anything more than insult people is whining?
about you like you're threatning US that you'll swict to another distro if the big bad wolf doesn't fix your damn browser. SUse, we don't get paid for anything here, it would be aBLESSING if you chose Fedora, go whine to them and fill THEIR lists with your constant dribble.
I think SuSE cares to keep customers. People like you may enjoy insulting people instead of helping them, but I think SuSE might care that people are starting to consider the distribution unstable and reconsidering whether it's worth paying for. Thus my comments. Nothing more. Definitely not worthy of your derision and rudeness.
My OS isn't finished but if I ever market it, you can be sure if someone started complaining this badly instead of telling the developers about the problem, I'd personally pay for a copy of another OS and have it sent to your house.
okay..... Anyway, can we end this now? Are you done yelling at me? Preston