Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
ZDNet has compared Linux and NT as fileserver and webserver on identical machines.
<A HREF="http://www.zdnet.com/sr/stories/issue/0,4537,387506,00.html"><A HREF="http://www.zdnet.com/sr/stories/issue/0,4537,387506,00.html</A">http://www.zdnet.com/sr/stories/issue/0,4537,387506,00.html</A</A>>
I quote:
"You might think that Linux would operate at a disadvantage here, but Linux kicks NT's butt. Only at the lightest loads does NT hold any advantage over the Linuxes. Once the load moves to 12 clients, all the Linux platforms take commanding leads over NT."
I knew it all the time!
"Linux with Apache beats NT 4.0 with IIS, hands down. SuSE, the least effective Linux, is 16 percent faster than IIS, and Caldera, the leader, is 50 percent faster. "
Hm, "SusE, the least effective Linux"???
Nah, must be a typo... ;=) -- / Tina E-MAIL <A HREF="mailto:chjo@tripnet.se">mailto:chjo@tripnet.se</A> URL <A HREF="http://www8.tripnet.se/~chjo/"><A HREF="http://www8.tripnet.se/~chjo/</A">http://www8.tripnet.se/~chjo/</A</A>> - To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e Check out the SuSE-FAQ at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/"><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A">http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/</A</A>> and the archiv at <A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html"><A HREF="http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A">http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html</A</A>>