On Monday 29 May 2006 10:59, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 12:06 -0400, Bruce Marshall wrote:
Well said.....
No offense, but if you don't know how IPv6 works, you're spreading _FUD_. Here, you want "condescending"?
Shut up if you haven't used IPv6!
Better?
Yup, that's pretty condescending..... You act to me like a 22 yr old who really thinks he's God's gift to computers and a) you know everything, and b) you really enjoy telling all the rest of us know-nothings about computers. BS! I'll match you experience any day but why bother? You'd still be insufferable. You're a new-comer to this list. (nothing wrong with that) but your tone and behavior doesn't lend itself to the friendly behavior of most of the members. Hoping you have a short stay here. <PLONK> P.S. Please learn to not send emails directly to posters.... We all get the emails from the list.
I have read no less than 2-dozen different _incorrect_ statements in various statements here in the last week on just 3 different subjects. Almost all of it has been FUD-based.
And then you have responses based on that FUD and proliferation.
I _never_ disagreed with the attitude of disabling IPv6. But IPv6 is a _dream_ to wield on a network with just a couple of concepts. It is _easier_ to support IPv4, and things like the LINK LOCAL address -- enabled by distros -- have _nothing_ to do with Internet.
-- +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + Bruce S. Marshall bmarsh@bmarsh.com Bellaire, MI 05/29/06 12:08 + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ "He who is flogged by fate and laughs the louder is a masochist."