Am Sonntag 07 Dezember 2008 02:06:54 schrieb Larry Stotler:
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Rajko M. <rmatov101@charter.net> wrote:
What makes option in main installation selection menu better then one in Other section?
Because many users don't ever look in the "others" section. I may not have if I didn't know that KDE3 would be there.
Why shall new users install a old Desktop wich will fade away over the next - say - two years. And long time users, that stick to KDE3 will find, if they need it. Where is the problem?
The main section is what is recommended. GNOME for alphabetical reasons and KDE4 as a future desktop =:-)
11.0's should have been used now. IF KDE4 is fully done to whatever extent whoever feels it is ready, then I would say do the change. I don't agree with it in 11.1, but it's not my decision, and I was voted down.
KDE4 - like KDE3 - will never be full done. Ther will always someting to be added...
IMHO, who wants KDE3 will find it.
perhaps
It is intersting that people using bleeding edge software, which is openSUSE, show so much reluctance to accept opportunity to influence new software development.
The only bleeding ege I use is the kernel for hardware and Firefox. And, honestly, if I still had good copies of 10.2 I could be just as fine with that. KDE4 is where it gets bleeding edge. I don't use openoffice, mon, songbird, or whatever. Just KOffice, Firefox, and MPlayer. I stick with SuSE for Yast more than anything else other than the comprehensive set of packages. Dependencies are what such(installing nokia tools when I dont' have a nokia and wouldn't want one, and so on).
Interesting, your major apps aren't KDE apps. So you can use every desktop, you wan't without a problem. Even a non-linux one. Herbert -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org