13 Jun
2013
13 Jun
'13
19:09
On 2013-06-13 18:03, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 10:18 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
fyi: This is a new call to me and I've never used it, so I have no first hand feedback.
Initial tests look promising. When the call is done, the cache drops by whatever the app has caused to be added. Unlike the brute-force approach I first did, the cache for other activities is not effected.
Let me clarify. The cache initially grows while calls are made, and when the file is closed, it drops. About to gigs, right? Well that's very good, just what you need. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 12.3 x86_64 "Dartmouth" at Telcontar)