On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 20:09 +0100, Kevanf1 wrote:
Bryan, I think you are forgetting that these are people who are used to SuSE in the same way that you are used to Fedora or Debian. They (and me) are simply not used to and should not expect these 'installer' issues. In a distro' as normally polished as SuSE has become it should not happen and is a first point stumbling block to getting further, everyday user information and possible minor bugs. I had hoped to install SuSE 10.1 myself today but unfortunately life intruded. Hopefully I'll try it tomorrow and see how it goes.
I've been deploying SLES since SLES 7, and I've also installed, supported and even built RPMS (i.e., writing the SPEC file) for SuSE Linux 7.x, 8.x and 9.x too. I just admit that I use and support RHEL and Fedora Core more. Every distro has its installer quirks. SuSE Linux has had it's share too. I don't see anything abnormal with SuSE Linux 10.1, other than the updater -- which has been admitted to. But the installer isn't the distro. If I sat and installed distros all day, over and over, I wouldn't use Linux. -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, technical annoyance mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org http://thebs413.blogspot.com ------------------------------------------------------- Illegal Immigration = "Representation Without Taxation" -- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com